Skip to content

Back to parent page - Aerosol nucleation


Initial growth of new particles

Case categorization

After calculating the nucleation rate \(J^*\) and the properties of new particles (nuclei) using physics-based or empirical parameterizations (see, e.g., this page on binary nucleation and this page on nucleation in the PBL), the dry volume of a new particle, \(V_{d,nuc}\) (unit: \(\rm m^3\)), and the dry diameter \(D_{d,nuc}\) (unit: m) are diagnosed as follows.

\[ \begin{align} V_{d,nuc} &= \frac{n_{H_2SO_4} M_{w,SO_4}} {N_{\mathrm{A}} \rho_{H_2SO_4}} \,, \\ D_{d,nuc} &= \left( \frac{6 V_{d,nuc}}{\pi} \right)^{\frac{1}{3}} \,. \end{align} \]

This dry diameter is compared with the predefined lower and upper bounds of particle diameter (unit: m) of the smallest lognormal mode. In MAM4, these are the smallest and largest diameters of the Aitken mode given by

\[ \begin{align} D_{p,lo} &= \exp \left[ 0.67 \ln (8.7 \cdot 10^{-9}) + 0.33 \ln (26 \cdot 10^{-9}) \right] \,, \\ %% about 12.5 nm D_{p,hi} &= 52 \cdot 10^{-9} \,. \end{align} \]
  • If \(D_{d,nuc} > D_{p,lo}\), then the new particles are sufficiently large to be described by the lognormal modes. In this case, MAM will let \(J_{nuc} = J^*\) and return to the host model the tendencies given at the end of the section on notation and assumptions.

  • More often, we will find that \(D_{d,nuc} \leq D_{p,lo}\). The initial growth of the newly nucleated small particles is parameterized using a revised version of the method described in Kerminen and Kulmala (2002).

Note

Worth revisiting whether \(D_{p,lo}\)=8.7 nm makes more sense.

Assumptions for the initial growth

The parameterization of Kerminen and Kulmala (2002) use the following simplifying assumptions.

  • The only important sink for the newly formed nuclei is their coagulation with the pre-existing particles. That is, the self-coagulation of fresh nuclei is ignored.

  • The only important source of mass for the growth of nuclei is the condensation of chemical gases, and the condensation rate is assumed to be constant within one time step.

  • The population of pre-existing larger particles and the concentration of condensible vapors remain unchanged within one time step.

  • The condensable vapor species responsible for nuclei growth are non-volatile.

The apparent nucleation rate

The growth of fresh nuclei due to the condensation of sulfuric acid gas and the decrease of nuclei number concentration due to coagulation with pre-existing particles are taken into account to estimate the so-called apparent nucleation rate, i.e., the source term for the Aitken-mode particle number concentration:

\[ J_{nuc} = J^* \exp \left( \frac{\eta}{D_{nuc,fin}} - \frac{\eta}{D_{nuc,ini}} \right) \]

where \(D_{nuc,ini}\) and \(D_{nuc,fin}\) are the wet diameters (unit: nm) before and after nuclei growth,

\(D_{nuc,ini} = \max (2r^*, 1)\)

\(D_{nuc,fin} = 10^9 D_{p,lo} f_{v}^{\frac 13}\),

where \(f_{v}\) is the ratio of wet volume to dry volume of a particle estimated using a simple Kohler approximation for \(\rm NH_{4}HSO_{4}\) (This approximation follows the Kohler theory used for the aerosol water uptake in MAM but neglects the surface curvature effect. The composition is assumed as pure ammonium bisulfate with hygroscopicity = 0.56),

\[ f_{v} = 1 - \frac{0.56}{\ln (\min(\max(\rm RH,0.1),0.95))} \]

The quantity \(\eta\) in the expression of the apparent nucleation rate is given by

\[ \begin{align} \eta &= \frac{\gamma CS^\prime}{GR} \,. \\ \end{align} \]

with

\[ \begin{align} \gamma &= 0.23 D_{nuc,ini}^{0.2} (\frac{D_{nuc,fin}}{3})^{0.075} (\frac{\rho_{nuc}}{1000})^{-0.33} (\frac{T}{293})^{-0.75} \,. \label{eq:gamma} \\ \end{align} \]

Note that this expression of \(\gamma\) has omitted one factor in Eq. (22) of Kerminen and Kulmala (2002) that involves the number mean diameter of the pre-existing particle population. That factor is assumed to be close to 1.

\(\rho_{nuc}\) is the density of nuclei (unit: kg per \(\rm m^3\) of nuclei) after considering the aerosol water uptake by sulfate,

\[ \rho_{nuc} = \frac{\rho_{H_2SO_4}}{f_{v}} \,.\]

\(GR\) is the nuclei growth rate (unit: \(\rm m~s^{-1}\)) estimated as

\[ \begin{align} GR &= \frac{3.0 \cdot 10^{-9} v_{H_2SO_4} M_{w,H_2SO_4} c_{n,H_2SO_4}} {\rho_{nuc}} \,. \\ \end{align} \]

\(v_{H_2SO_4}\) is the approximated mean molecular speed of H\(_2\)SO\(_4\) gas (unit: \(\rm m~s^{-1}\)),

\[ \begin{align} v_{H_2SO_4} &= 14.7 \sqrt{T} \,, \\ \end{align} \]

\(CS^\prime\) in the expression of \(\gamma\) is referred to as the condensation sink in Kerminen and Kulmala (2002). The calculation of \(CS^\prime\) in MAM uses the H\(_2\)SO\(_4\) condensation coefficient (\(C_{sum,H_2SO_4}\) unit: \(s^{-1}\)) from the gas-aerosol exchange parameterization, and is different from Kerminen and Kulmala (2002):

\[ CS^\prime = \frac{C_{sum,H_2SO_4}} {4 \pi \mathbb{D}_{g,H_2SO_4} \alpha_{H_2SO_4}} \,, \label{eq:cs_prime} \\ \]

\(\mathbb{D}_{g,H_2SO_4}\) is the approximated gas diffusivity of H\(_2\)SO\(_4\) gas (unit: \(\rm m^2~s^{-1}\)),

\[ \mathbb{D}_{g,H_2SO_4} = \frac{6.7037 \cdot 10^{-6} T^{0.75}} {c_{air}} \,. \\ \]
Back to top